Le 19 octobre 2024 à 23:25:55 :

Le 19 octobre 2024 à 23:21:27 :

Le 19 octobre 2024 à 23:20:45 :

Le 19 octobre 2024 à 23:19:19 :

[23:14:45] <TraumaTeamCorp>

> Le 19 octobre 2024 à 23:01:40 :

>> Le 19 octobre 2024 à 22:59:02 :

> >> Le 19 octobre 2024 à 22:55:32 :

> > >> Le 19 octobre 2024 à 22:54:24 :

> > > >> Le 19 octobre 2024 à 22:52:59 :

> > > > >> Le 19 octobre 2024 à 22:47:56 :

> > > > > >> Le 19 octobre 2024 à 22:46:14 :

> > > > > > >> Le 19 octobre 2024 à 22:42:11 :

> > > > > > > >> Le 19 octobre 2024 à 22:37:07 :

> > > > > > > > >> Le 19 octobre 2024 à 22:25:35 :

> > > > > > > > > >2026 SpoilAfficherMasquer ou 2027

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > SpoilAfficherMasquerpeut être 2028

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Nofake ?

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > t'emballe pas ca va être repoussé

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Franchement arrête de troller, c'est soulant.

> > > > > > > C'est prévu pour 2026, donc ton avis, on s'en passera.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Tout comme il était pevu pour 2016

> > > > > > Mais cette fois si c'est la bonne, on y croit très fort

> > > > >

> > > > > Et alors, dans l'industrie du jeu vidéo, tu n'as jamais vu des titres repoussés pour x raison ?

> > > >

> > > > Si, duke nukem forever

> > >

> > >

> > > Je t'ai dit d'arrêter de troller.

> >

> > hors sol

>

> On est habitué avec eux

> En 2016 tu leur dis que sq42 sortira au mieux dans 10 ans tu te fais insulter et traiter de hater, et maintenant c'est la réalité telle que communiquée par cig

D'accord madame Irma !
C'est bon, tu as fini de jouer la victime ?

Il a raison en revanche.

J'ai dit qu'il avait tort ?

Pourquoi impliquer que je fais de la spéculation alors ?

Car quand tu avais fait tes "prédictions" avant 2016, ce n'était que des pures spéculations.

Ca s'appelle de la lucidité qui se sert d'une compréhension correcte du model économique de CIG pour conclure qu'ils n'ont aucun intérêt à sortir leur jeu et qu'il sera donc repoussé encore et encore

merci madame irma

Le 19 octobre 2024 à 23:40:47 :
merci madame irma

De rien et à bientôt pour de nouvelles prédictions comme : roberts est un menteur, de nouveau vaisseaux hors de prix vont sortir et vous ne verrez pas de vers ingame

Le 19 octobre 2024 à 22:47:56 :

Le 19 octobre 2024 à 22:46:14 :

Le 19 octobre 2024 à 22:42:11 :

Le 19 octobre 2024 à 22:37:07 :

Le 19 octobre 2024 à 22:25:35 :
2026 SpoilAfficherMasquer ou 2027

SpoilAfficherMasquer

peut être 2028

Nofake ?

t'emballe pas ca va être repoussé

Franchement arrête de troller, c'est soulant.
C'est prévu pour 2026, donc ton avis, on s'en passera.

Tout comme il était pevu pour 2016
Mais cette fois si c'est la bonne, on y croit très fort

Le 19 octobre 2024 à 23:29:11 :

Le 19 octobre 2024 à 23:25:55 :

Le 19 octobre 2024 à 23:21:27 :

Le 19 octobre 2024 à 23:20:45 :

Le 19 octobre 2024 à 23:19:19 :

>[23:14:45] <TraumaTeamCorp>

>> Le 19 octobre 2024 à 23:01:40 :

>>> Le 19 octobre 2024 à 22:59:02 :

>> >> Le 19 octobre 2024 à 22:55:32 :

>> > >> Le 19 octobre 2024 à 22:54:24 :

>> > > >> Le 19 octobre 2024 à 22:52:59 :

>> > > > >> Le 19 octobre 2024 à 22:47:56 :

>> > > > > >> Le 19 octobre 2024 à 22:46:14 :

>> > > > > > >> Le 19 octobre 2024 à 22:42:11 :

>> > > > > > > >> Le 19 octobre 2024 à 22:37:07 :

>> > > > > > > > >> Le 19 octobre 2024 à 22:25:35 :

>> > > > > > > > > >2026 SpoilAfficherMasquer ou 2027

>> > > > > > > > > >

>> > > > > > > > > > SpoilAfficherMasquerpeut être 2028

>> > > > > > > > >

>> > > > > > > > > Nofake ?

>> > > > > > > >

>> > > > > > > > t'emballe pas ca va être repoussé

>> > > > > > >

>> > > > > > > Franchement arrête de troller, c'est soulant.

>> > > > > > > C'est prévu pour 2026, donc ton avis, on s'en passera.

>> > > > > >

>> > > > > > Tout comme il était pevu pour 2016

>> > > > > > Mais cette fois si c'est la bonne, on y croit très fort

>> > > > >

>> > > > > Et alors, dans l'industrie du jeu vidéo, tu n'as jamais vu des titres repoussés pour x raison ?

>> > > >

>> > > > Si, duke nukem forever

>> > >

>> > >

>> > > Je t'ai dit d'arrêter de troller.

>> >

>> > hors sol

>>

>> On est habitué avec eux

>> En 2016 tu leur dis que sq42 sortira au mieux dans 10 ans tu te fais insulter et traiter de hater, et maintenant c'est la réalité telle que communiquée par cig

>

>D'accord madame Irma !

>C'est bon, tu as fini de jouer la victime ?

Il a raison en revanche.

J'ai dit qu'il avait tort ?

Pourquoi impliquer que je fais de la spéculation alors ?

Car quand tu avais fait tes "prédictions" avant 2016, ce n'était que des pures spéculations.

Ca s'appelle de la lucidité qui se sert d'une compréhension correcte du model économique de CIG pour conclure qu'ils n'ont aucun intérêt à sortir leur jeu et qu'il sera donc repoussé encore et encore

cette fois c'est la bonne

ils ne peuvent pas repoussé a l'infini le jeu

putain vous êtes épuisants

Le 20 octobre 2024 à 00:19:41 :
putain vous êtes épuisants

On est un peu excité , c'est la bonne putain !

2014
il a l'air trop bien ce jeu star citizen , j'achète avec l'argent de mon stage ahi

2024

10 ans qu'on attend une date putain je suis nordwood III maintenant

Le ver géant arrive les rageux

Le 19 octobre 2024 à 23:56:28 :

Le 19 octobre 2024 à 23:40:47 :
merci madame irma

De rien et à bientôt pour de nouvelles prédictions comme : roberts est un menteur, de nouveau vaisseaux hors de prix vont sortir et vous ne verrez pas de vers ingame

je t'invite à lire ce commentaire

ce commentaire sur spectrum résume bien le truc

I Made this post elsewhere but it stands for your comments too.

All Development from scratch starts of extremely slow (CIG had to rebuild a engine to suit there needs for heaven sake). Now lets Look at how many years it has taken to Develop Stanton (hint its still being developed/updated)
Pyro has taken half the time to be as feature complete as Stanton but again still not complete as the standards shown in today video will not have been reached yet.

But the tech used is still not mature or final
The tech shown today looks to be close to the expectations/standards CIG wants from its procedural worlds. More Biomes, better Biome placements, , seasons & proper weather dynamics, Denser world in both Vegetation/Fauna & POI/Civilizations. Hell they even gave an example of improved tile placement so you don't see the "join lines" - this is reinforced when you Consider CIG are now talking about the "road to 1.0"

Now this tech upgrades means developers are forced to revisit old systems to bring them up to the new standard. Now think about it If CIG had the the resources and built 20 systems by now that would require a huge amount of effort to bring them 20 systems up to the standards shown in today's videos.

Luckily enough CIG couldnt as they required to work on there Core tech which people seem to be quick in forgetting isn't a easy job to do and been a long bumpy road due to the cryengine not being suitable for the task.
Item 2.0?
Object Streaming? (3.30 2018)
Network Bind Culling (3.30 2018)
Network OCS Stall Fixes (3.5 2019)
Client to Server Actor Networking Rework (3.6 2019)
Harvestable Entity Spawning (3.6 2019)
Server-side Object Container Streaming (3.8 2019)
Planet tech V4 (3.8 2019)
Rivers tech
Persistent Entity Streaming
Gen 12 Renderer
Vulkan Renderer
Server Meshing

all the above are tech what has been implemented in the past 6 years because they take a lot of time and resources to do but this is specialized tech for the star engine engineers,
majority of the programmers,art, graphics designers cant support in this so they were utilized in the single player side in the meantime hench the drought in the late 2.X/Early 3. Era

Now we are getting close to the point where the tech has matured that a entire system could potentially be made within a week by 1 person. (Excluding major hubs/cities)
So from Stanton what is still in development 10+ years on to potentially making a whole system in a week?
Now before people start going o then why have they only announced two more systems and still only 1 has been released. again this goes back to the core tech Server meshing.
Without the server meshing we wouldn't of had Pyro or any other new system, so again why develop said systems two years ago if thew tech to handle them wasn't ready? and then they are also be made to a below standard and would of had to been revisited reworked.... costing more money & time.. Sounds Like it would be smarter to hold of making the systems until ... server meshing is done & the planet tech .. matures wait that is exactly what CIG is doing and where we are right NOW.

+ Bonus Squadron 42 is feature complete, and what did we experience last year? prob the bigger jump in Assets in SC in any of its years/history. Because the art team programmers are now back on board. So POI, biomes, to Cities/Hubs to even ships will start seeing more resources allocated to them and start flowing a lot quicker.

Le 20 octobre 2024 à 00:34:13 :

Le 19 octobre 2024 à 23:56:28 :

Le 19 octobre 2024 à 23:40:47 :
merci madame irma

De rien et à bientôt pour de nouvelles prédictions comme : roberts est un menteur, de nouveau vaisseaux hors de prix vont sortir et vous ne verrez pas de vers ingame

je t'invite à lire ce commentaire

ce commentaire sur spectrum résume bien le truc

I Made this post elsewhere but it stands for your comments too.

All Development from scratch starts of extremely slow (CIG had to rebuild a engine to suit there needs for heaven sake). Now lets Look at how many years it has taken to Develop Stanton (hint its still being developed/updated)
Pyro has taken half the time to be as feature complete as Stanton but again still not complete as the standards shown in today video will not have been reached yet.

But the tech used is still not mature or final
The tech shown today looks to be close to the expectations/standards CIG wants from its procedural worlds. More Biomes, better Biome placements, , seasons & proper weather dynamics, Denser world in both Vegetation/Fauna & POI/Civilizations. Hell they even gave an example of improved tile placement so you don't see the "join lines" - this is reinforced when you Consider CIG are now talking about the "road to 1.0"

Now this tech upgrades means developers are forced to revisit old systems to bring them up to the new standard. Now think about it If CIG had the the resources and built 20 systems by now that would require a huge amount of effort to bring them 20 systems up to the standards shown in today's videos.

Luckily enough CIG couldnt as they required to work on there Core tech which people seem to be quick in forgetting isn't a easy job to do and been a long bumpy road due to the cryengine not being suitable for the task.
Item 2.0?
Object Streaming? (3.30 2018)
Network Bind Culling (3.30 2018)
Network OCS Stall Fixes (3.5 2019)
Client to Server Actor Networking Rework (3.6 2019)
Harvestable Entity Spawning (3.6 2019)
Server-side Object Container Streaming (3.8 2019)
Planet tech V4 (3.8 2019)
Rivers tech
Persistent Entity Streaming
Gen 12 Renderer
Vulkan Renderer
Server Meshing

all the above are tech what has been implemented in the past 6 years because they take a lot of time and resources to do but this is specialized tech for the star engine engineers,
majority of the programmers,art, graphics designers cant support in this so they were utilized in the single player side in the meantime hench the drought in the late 2.X/Early 3. Era

Now we are getting close to the point where the tech has matured that a entire system could potentially be made within a week by 1 person. (Excluding major hubs/cities)
So from Stanton what is still in development 10+ years on to potentially making a whole system in a week?
Now before people start going o then why have they only announced two more systems and still only 1 has been released. again this goes back to the core tech Server meshing.
Without the server meshing we wouldn't of had Pyro or any other new system, so again why develop said systems two years ago if thew tech to handle them wasn't ready? and then they are also be made to a below standard and would of had to been revisited reworked.... costing more money & time.. Sounds Like it would be smarter to hold of making the systems until ... server meshing is done & the planet tech .. matures wait that is exactly what CIG is doing and where we are right NOW.

+ Bonus Squadron 42 is feature complete, and what did we experience last year? prob the bigger jump in Assets in SC in any of its years/history. Because the art team programmers are now back on board. So POI, biomes, to Cities/Hubs to even ships will start seeing more resources allocated to them and start flowing a lot quicker.

résumé ?

eh bien, j'espère que vous êtes juste des gamins par encore couché... Parce que si vous êtes des "adultes" ça craint un peu votre niveau d'enfantillage.

Le 20 octobre 2024 à 00:41:15 :
eh bien, j'espère que vous êtes juste des gamins par encore couché... Parce que si vous êtes des "adultes" ça craint un peu votre niveau d'enfantillage.

tu n'as pas a nous dire ca

Le 20 octobre 2024 à 00:45:04 :

Le 20 octobre 2024 à 00:41:15 :
eh bien, j'espère que vous êtes juste des gamins par encore couché... Parce que si vous êtes des "adultes" ça craint un peu votre niveau d'enfantillage.

tu n'as pas a nous dire ca

On est d’accord qu’il avait clairement pas à dire ça ?

Le 20 octobre 2024 à 00:35:49 :

Le 20 octobre 2024 à 00:34:13 :

Le 19 octobre 2024 à 23:56:28 :

Le 19 octobre 2024 à 23:40:47 :
merci madame irma

De rien et à bientôt pour de nouvelles prédictions comme : roberts est un menteur, de nouveau vaisseaux hors de prix vont sortir et vous ne verrez pas de vers ingame

je t'invite à lire ce commentaire

ce commentaire sur spectrum résume bien le truc

I Made this post elsewhere but it stands for your comments too.

All Development from scratch starts of extremely slow (CIG had to rebuild a engine to suit there needs for heaven sake). Now lets Look at how many years it has taken to Develop Stanton (hint its still being developed/updated)
Pyro has taken half the time to be as feature complete as Stanton but again still not complete as the standards shown in today video will not have been reached yet.

But the tech used is still not mature or final
The tech shown today looks to be close to the expectations/standards CIG wants from its procedural worlds. More Biomes, better Biome placements, , seasons & proper weather dynamics, Denser world in both Vegetation/Fauna & POI/Civilizations. Hell they even gave an example of improved tile placement so you don't see the "join lines" - this is reinforced when you Consider CIG are now talking about the "road to 1.0"

Now this tech upgrades means developers are forced to revisit old systems to bring them up to the new standard. Now think about it If CIG had the the resources and built 20 systems by now that would require a huge amount of effort to bring them 20 systems up to the standards shown in today's videos.

Luckily enough CIG couldnt as they required to work on there Core tech which people seem to be quick in forgetting isn't a easy job to do and been a long bumpy road due to the cryengine not being suitable for the task.
Item 2.0?
Object Streaming? (3.30 2018)
Network Bind Culling (3.30 2018)
Network OCS Stall Fixes (3.5 2019)
Client to Server Actor Networking Rework (3.6 2019)
Harvestable Entity Spawning (3.6 2019)
Server-side Object Container Streaming (3.8 2019)
Planet tech V4 (3.8 2019)
Rivers tech
Persistent Entity Streaming
Gen 12 Renderer
Vulkan Renderer
Server Meshing

all the above are tech what has been implemented in the past 6 years because they take a lot of time and resources to do but this is specialized tech for the star engine engineers,
majority of the programmers,art, graphics designers cant support in this so they were utilized in the single player side in the meantime hench the drought in the late 2.X/Early 3. Era

Now we are getting close to the point where the tech has matured that a entire system could potentially be made within a week by 1 person. (Excluding major hubs/cities)
So from Stanton what is still in development 10+ years on to potentially making a whole system in a week?
Now before people start going o then why have they only announced two more systems and still only 1 has been released. again this goes back to the core tech Server meshing.
Without the server meshing we wouldn't of had Pyro or any other new system, so again why develop said systems two years ago if thew tech to handle them wasn't ready? and then they are also be made to a below standard and would of had to been revisited reworked.... costing more money & time.. Sounds Like it would be smarter to hold of making the systems until ... server meshing is done & the planet tech .. matures wait that is exactly what CIG is doing and where we are right NOW.

+ Bonus Squadron 42 is feature complete, and what did we experience last year? prob the bigger jump in Assets in SC in any of its years/history. Because the art team programmers are now back on board. So POI, biomes, to Cities/Hubs to even ships will start seeing more resources allocated to them and start flowing a lot quicker.

résumé ?

Le commentaire explique que le développement de Star Citizen est lent car CIG a dû reconstruire un moteur de jeu adapté à ses besoins. Le système Stanton est en développement depuis plus de 10 ans, et bien que Pyro avance plus vite, il n'est pas encore terminé. Les technologies récentes, comme les biomes améliorés et les systèmes météorologiques, ne sont pas encore matures, ce qui ralentit la création de nouveaux systèmes stellaires.

CIG préfère attendre que les technologies soient prêtes, comme le Server Meshing, pour éviter de refaire du travail plus tard. Maintenant que Squadron 42 est terminé en termes de fonctionnalités, l'équipe peut se concentrer davantage sur le multijoueur, ce qui devrait accélérer le développement du jeu.

Cimer chatgpt mais c’est toujours trop long

Le 20 octobre 2024 à 00:49:52 :

Le 20 octobre 2024 à 00:35:49 :

Le 20 octobre 2024 à 00:34:13 :

Le 19 octobre 2024 à 23:56:28 :

Le 19 octobre 2024 à 23:40:47 :
merci madame irma

De rien et à bientôt pour de nouvelles prédictions comme : roberts est un menteur, de nouveau vaisseaux hors de prix vont sortir et vous ne verrez pas de vers ingame

je t'invite à lire ce commentaire

ce commentaire sur spectrum résume bien le truc

I Made this post elsewhere but it stands for your comments too.

All Development from scratch starts of extremely slow (CIG had to rebuild a engine to suit there needs for heaven sake). Now lets Look at how many years it has taken to Develop Stanton (hint its still being developed/updated)
Pyro has taken half the time to be as feature complete as Stanton but again still not complete as the standards shown in today video will not have been reached yet.

But the tech used is still not mature or final
The tech shown today looks to be close to the expectations/standards CIG wants from its procedural worlds. More Biomes, better Biome placements, , seasons & proper weather dynamics, Denser world in both Vegetation/Fauna & POI/Civilizations. Hell they even gave an example of improved tile placement so you don't see the "join lines" - this is reinforced when you Consider CIG are now talking about the "road to 1.0"

Now this tech upgrades means developers are forced to revisit old systems to bring them up to the new standard. Now think about it If CIG had the the resources and built 20 systems by now that would require a huge amount of effort to bring them 20 systems up to the standards shown in today's videos.

Luckily enough CIG couldnt as they required to work on there Core tech which people seem to be quick in forgetting isn't a easy job to do and been a long bumpy road due to the cryengine not being suitable for the task.
Item 2.0?
Object Streaming? (3.30 2018)
Network Bind Culling (3.30 2018)
Network OCS Stall Fixes (3.5 2019)
Client to Server Actor Networking Rework (3.6 2019)
Harvestable Entity Spawning (3.6 2019)
Server-side Object Container Streaming (3.8 2019)
Planet tech V4 (3.8 2019)
Rivers tech
Persistent Entity Streaming
Gen 12 Renderer
Vulkan Renderer
Server Meshing

all the above are tech what has been implemented in the past 6 years because they take a lot of time and resources to do but this is specialized tech for the star engine engineers,
majority of the programmers,art, graphics designers cant support in this so they were utilized in the single player side in the meantime hench the drought in the late 2.X/Early 3. Era

Now we are getting close to the point where the tech has matured that a entire system could potentially be made within a week by 1 person. (Excluding major hubs/cities)
So from Stanton what is still in development 10+ years on to potentially making a whole system in a week?
Now before people start going o then why have they only announced two more systems and still only 1 has been released. again this goes back to the core tech Server meshing.
Without the server meshing we wouldn't of had Pyro or any other new system, so again why develop said systems two years ago if thew tech to handle them wasn't ready? and then they are also be made to a below standard and would of had to been revisited reworked.... costing more money & time.. Sounds Like it would be smarter to hold of making the systems until ... server meshing is done & the planet tech .. matures wait that is exactly what CIG is doing and where we are right NOW.

+ Bonus Squadron 42 is feature complete, and what did we experience last year? prob the bigger jump in Assets in SC in any of its years/history. Because the art team programmers are now back on board. So POI, biomes, to Cities/Hubs to even ships will start seeing more resources allocated to them and start flowing a lot quicker.

résumé ?

Le commentaire explique que le développement de Star Citizen est lent car CIG a dû reconstruire un moteur de jeu adapté à ses besoins. Le système Stanton est en développement depuis plus de 10 ans, et bien que Pyro avance plus vite, il n'est pas encore terminé. Les technologies récentes, comme les biomes améliorés et les systèmes météorologiques, ne sont pas encore matures, ce qui ralentit la création de nouveaux systèmes stellaires.

CIG préfère attendre que les technologies soient prêtes, comme le Server Meshing, pour éviter de refaire du travail plus tard. Maintenant que Squadron 42 est terminé en termes de fonctionnalités, l'équipe peut se concentrer davantage sur le multijoueur, ce qui devrait accélérer le développement du jeu.

Cimer chatgpt mais c’est toujours trop long

ils avaient déjà expliquer ca l'an dernier

Hahaha z'êtes des oufs
Excellent

Le 20 octobre 2024 à 00:34:13 :

Le 19 octobre 2024 à 23:56:28 :

Le 19 octobre 2024 à 23:40:47 :
merci madame irma

De rien et à bientôt pour de nouvelles prédictions comme : roberts est un menteur, de nouveau vaisseaux hors de prix vont sortir et vous ne verrez pas de vers ingame

je t'invite à lire ce commentaire

ce commentaire sur spectrum résume bien le truc

I Made this post elsewhere but it stands for your comments too.

All Development from scratch starts of extremely slow (CIG had to rebuild a engine to suit there needs for heaven sake). Now lets Look at how many years it has taken to Develop Stanton (hint its still being developed/updated)
Pyro has taken half the time to be as feature complete as Stanton but again still not complete as the standards shown in today video will not have been reached yet.

But the tech used is still not mature or final
The tech shown today looks to be close to the expectations/standards CIG wants from its procedural worlds. More Biomes, better Biome placements, , seasons & proper weather dynamics, Denser world in both Vegetation/Fauna & POI/Civilizations. Hell they even gave an example of improved tile placement so you don't see the "join lines" - this is reinforced when you Consider CIG are now talking about the "road to 1.0"

Now this tech upgrades means developers are forced to revisit old systems to bring them up to the new standard. Now think about it If CIG had the the resources and built 20 systems by now that would require a huge amount of effort to bring them 20 systems up to the standards shown in today's videos.

Luckily enough CIG couldnt as they required to work on there Core tech which people seem to be quick in forgetting isn't a easy job to do and been a long bumpy road due to the cryengine not being suitable for the task.
Item 2.0?
Object Streaming? (3.30 2018)
Network Bind Culling (3.30 2018)
Network OCS Stall Fixes (3.5 2019)
Client to Server Actor Networking Rework (3.6 2019)
Harvestable Entity Spawning (3.6 2019)
Server-side Object Container Streaming (3.8 2019)
Planet tech V4 (3.8 2019)
Rivers tech
Persistent Entity Streaming
Gen 12 Renderer
Vulkan Renderer
Server Meshing

all the above are tech what has been implemented in the past 6 years because they take a lot of time and resources to do but this is specialized tech for the star engine engineers,
majority of the programmers,art, graphics designers cant support in this so they were utilized in the single player side in the meantime hench the drought in the late 2.X/Early 3. Era

Now we are getting close to the point where the tech has matured that a entire system could potentially be made within a week by 1 person. (Excluding major hubs/cities)
So from Stanton what is still in development 10+ years on to potentially making a whole system in a week?
Now before people start going o then why have they only announced two more systems and still only 1 has been released. again this goes back to the core tech Server meshing.
Without the server meshing we wouldn't of had Pyro or any other new system, so again why develop said systems two years ago if thew tech to handle them wasn't ready? and then they are also be made to a below standard and would of had to been revisited reworked.... costing more money & time.. Sounds Like it would be smarter to hold of making the systems until ... server meshing is done & the planet tech .. matures wait that is exactly what CIG is doing and where we are right NOW.

+ Bonus Squadron 42 is feature complete, and what did we experience last year? prob the bigger jump in Assets in SC in any of its years/history. Because the art team programmers are now back on board. So POI, biomes, to Cities/Hubs to even ships will start seeing more resources allocated to them and start flowing a lot quicker.

"ils sont en train de créer les outils", ca fait des années que ca sort ces excuses
Je me souviens en 2019 crunky et starduke me juraient que ca allait bientôt être fini et que maintenant ils allaient sortir un système par an.
No man's sky a presque eu le même temps de développement (et encore ce temps de dev ca inclut un an ou murray a bossé tout seul sur l'engine pendant son temps libre sans rien dire à personne), avec une fraction du budget et de personel, or no man's sky est fini lui. Pourquoi pas SC ?
Tu vas me dire que les transitions atmosphériques c'est la raison pour laquelle c'est encore une alpha ? Genre c'est quoi les différences qui font que SC ait besoin d'un budget de plusieurs ordres de magnitude plus élevés, de tellement plus de ressources, pour un résultat pas fini ?
Même si c'était vrai et que c'était les transiitions atmopshériques le problème, bah c'est juste un mauvais choix de design et la faute en revient à roberts.
Tout ce que tu cites, c'est des technos qui existent déjà. CIG n'invente rien de nouveau.

Le 20 octobre 2024 à 00:41:15 :
eh bien, j'espère que vous êtes juste des gamins par encore couché... Parce que si vous êtes des "adultes" ça craint un peu votre niveau d'enfantillage.

On a G.W Bush en avatar, on se sent adulte et responsable.

Le 20 octobre 2024 à 09:51:12 :

Le 20 octobre 2024 à 00:41:15 :
eh bien, j'espère que vous êtes juste des gamins par encore couché... Parce que si vous êtes des "adultes" ça craint un peu votre niveau d'enfantillage.

On a G.W Bush en avatar, on se sent adulte et responsable.

Ouai, alors pour le coup, c'est Abraham Lincoln et pas G. W. Bush